A recent statement by Assalafy Yola has ignited a heated debate surrounding the integrity of WikkiTimes and its portrayal of Sheikh Bala Lau, a prominent Islamic scholar and leader of the largest Sunni movement in West Africa.
Hikaya Newspaper reports that Yola’s remarks challenge the legitimacy of WikkiTimes’ claims, labeling them as a smear campaign driven by ignorance and envy.
Yola argues that the notion of Islamic scholars distancing themselves from government involvement is a misunderstanding of both Islamic history and governance. He cites examples of respected scholars, such as Sheikh Abdulrahman Al-Sudais and the late Sheikh Abubakar Mahmud Gumi, who engaged with state affairs without compromising their moral authority. This historical context, Yola asserts, highlights the fallacy of WikkiTimes’ accusations.
The criticism directed at WikkiTimes centers on its journalistic practices, particularly its reliance on damaging video content and the subsequent lack of accountability. Yola emphasizes that true journalism adheres to ethical standards, including seeking the truth and minimizing harm. He contends that WikkiTimes failed to uphold these principles, instead opting for sensationalism over factual reporting.
Yola points out the selective focus on Sheikh Bala Lau amidst a broader context of alleged corruption, questioning why other names connected to the same contract were overlooked. He suggests that this targeted approach reveals an ulterior motive to tarnish Lau’s reputation, as he represents a significant force for positive change within the community.
The Al-Ali Security Guard contract, which has come under scrutiny, was publicly awarded and widely reported, challenging the narrative of secrecy and scandal presented by WikkiTimes. Yola argues that there is nothing immoral about a scholar engaging in legitimate business practices, asserting that such actions are protected under Nigeria’s Constitution.
In a further rebuttal, Yola defends Lau’s agricultural endeavors, highlighting his contributions to local farming and community development. He argues that Lau’s success as a farmer and businessman exemplifies national service, countering the derogatory remarks made by WikkiTimes regarding Lau’s profession.
Yola also addresses the misconception that scholars lose their independence when they engage with the state. He cites the example of Prophet Yusuf, who served in a non-Islamic regime while upholding justice, reinforcing the idea that scholars can participate in governance without compromising their principles.
Despite the attacks, Yola asserts that Sheikh Bala Lau does not rely on government support for his success. He emphasizes Lau’s philanthropic efforts, including funding mosques and supporting orphans, as evidence of his commitment to community welfare and Islamic values.
In closing, Yola calls for a reevaluation of journalistic integrity, urging WikkiTimes to prioritize objectivity and factual reporting over sensationalism. He warns that the moral arguments presented must be grounded in ethical reasoning rather than emotional outbursts.
Ultimately, Yola posits that Sheikh Bala Lau’s legacy will be defined by his positive impact on society, rather than the criticisms levied against him. He concludes with a reminder that true accountability lies beyond public opinion, resting instead in the realm of justice and moral conduct.